So, Leo had posted a Twitter update a few months ago. Last month I emailed Stickam about it, to see if there was any progress. I especially like this screen:
"...in some cases it may not be possible to get back to you." Guess what happened. So I emailed them again today. And I'm blogging about it. And I'm saying that Ustream would have been a better choice. Leo has said that he didn't accept $100,000 but I wonder.... Why won't anybody say anything about this?
Just found this before I posted. Mashable.com says that these are the terms, including revenue sharing.
Update: Here's a quote from Leo:
Mark, you should have asked me - I would have told you the truth. Stickam has _not_ sent me any check. We have a revenue sharing deal that I hope will generate MORE than $100,000 a year, but I'm not buying that Bently any time soon. Streaming video numbers are much much lower than audio podcast numbers, at least for now.My response:
Watch twitlive.tv for 10 minutes then tell me I chose the wrong provider!
You chose the wrong provider. Sure, it looks slick but it doesn't work...